No. 19-8323

William George Coodey v. Oklahoma

Lower Court: Oklahoma
Docketed: 2020-04-21
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: consent criminal-procedure dna-evidence dna-testing due-process factual-innocence jackson-v-virginia rape sixth-amendment
Latest Conference: 2020-06-18
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether DNA testing that would undermine an alleged rape victim's testimony denying consent to sexual intercourse would create sufficient uncertainty of the verdict as to constitute a claim under Jackson v. Virginia or factual innocence

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

No question identified. : IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI Petitioner respectfully prays that a writ of certiorari issue to review the judgment below. OPINIONS BELOW [ ] For cases from federal courts: The opinion of the United States court of appeals appears at

Docket Entries

2020-06-22
Petition DENIED.
2020-06-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/18/2020.
2020-04-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 21, 2020)

Attorneys

William George Coodey
William George Coodey — Petitioner
William George Coodey — Petitioner