No. 19-8323
William George Coodey v. Oklahoma
IFP
Tags: consent criminal-procedure dna-evidence dna-testing due-process factual-innocence jackson-v-virginia rape sixth-amendment
Latest Conference:
2020-06-18
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether DNA testing that would undermine an alleged rape victim's testimony denying consent to sexual intercourse would create sufficient uncertainty of the verdict as to constitute a claim under Jackson v. Virginia or factual innocence
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
No question identified. : IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI Petitioner respectfully prays that a writ of certiorari issue to review the judgment below. OPINIONS BELOW [ ] For cases from federal courts: The opinion of the United States court of appeals appears at
Docket Entries
2020-06-22
Petition DENIED.
2020-06-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/18/2020.
2020-04-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 21, 2020)