Courtney Rashon Johnson v. United States
SocialSecurity Securities
Whether a defendant who pleaded guilty can seek relief from his conviction on the basis that the government failed to instruct the grand jury on an essential element of the offense
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED . i) The N**Crcor concedes that Jolson Sobstanal AMES WEE Alot ~nolated cohen -+he Coveonment declined +o wstwet Usinigons Jon of the S-wttoS: Element bud denied Sanasenl ache Bot ex the ote. Wand the 4th Crtart concedes 4nat(CGaar F.3d 2620 wL 1993523 +e 4 Cireconrt Marcas Qodo) SoloStanil AShHS WER vowed duetofwk Cuey SiSned A Alea Onuastel henctly because WE Plea Los Lorthook the States Element and Such AN Exroe 1S Steoctveal, So Nod can Gra w the 4** Creeit Sek eelief by Signin9 4 Plea Lothook Me StatoS Element, but Johnson Set deniad ache w the it" Curevit foe Sowkon Jory Uors never wsteocted of the SAME ete WHSSiN9 Element ? 2.) Did she +reawl erred cohen r+ failed to Sant A JudSemen+ oe Adviral Lohen the Seveewment failed to Present _a Soffuent Prof of EACH And every elewent fom whch A Aanonal Jofor Cool Conclude beYond A REASonable doob} that Joha8on vows Suit’ ? 3.) Hous could the Goveenwent Ever obtaned Jonschechon cohen the Sovernment never Preseattéd AM the Elaments Required Alemner. Proved ali foor Elements iniedod puS.the ESSearinl Seles Eleven to +he Sand Jory P | | Q VESTIONS Presenred | 4) rf whew ate A Cate3on of “q+ YPe of Felons Ahat 13 Poleted Poo PosSessin3 a Cecaemn LOoWIeh ate Fetons that VEEN convicted of Felomes consisted af wmueder QarE. mauslMoShter, Labbe, sccm, larceny, Anson. MAYKeM, Jd buorglae’, As» non-violent offender. nak * bean Conmesed of A Ceony Anat bans ov Poibit we from POSESSING A fiecaom So ASO New-violent offnde: how can xt be whet chuesed, aud Conviesed of Possession of a Peeaen bY a caonwrested fbn ? Lary Edvowed dathcldy JeFReemn Bsesons CaS AO. 3*K0-cv 00583 ita RTD