Whether CLARK's Affirmed Sentence & Judgment Must be Vacated in light of REHAIF, 139 S.Ct. 2191 (2019), Then Remanded, Where it is Warranted that CLARK Be Free to Argue On Remand All Available Claim(s), Which Include, but are Not Limited To The Applicability of REHAIF, 139 S.Ct. 2191, Upon the Existing Correlative Duty of The GOVERNMENT To Protect CLARK Against Injury from Any Quarter, While So Held?

Questions Presented ; ; Whether CLARK's Affirmed Sentence & Judgment Must be Vacated in light of : REHAIF, 139 S.Ct. 2191 (2019), Then Remanded, Where it is Warranted that CLARK : Be Free to Argue On Remand All Available Claim(s), Which Include, but are Not : . Limited To The Applicability of REHAIF, 139 S.Ct. 2191, Upon the Existing . : ; Correlative Duty of The GOVERNMENT To Protect CLARK Against Injury from. Any : Quarter, While So Held? :