No. 19-6019
Marco Antonio Murillo v. United States
Tags: criminal-procedure due-process federal-defendants indictment indictment-right mandatory-minimum mandatory-sentencing sentencing sentencing-enhancement united-states-v-haymond
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2019-10-18
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether federal defendants enjoy the right to indictment as to some facts that alter the likely sentence within a mandatory range of punishment?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether federal defendants enjoy the right to indictment as to some facts that alter the likely sentence within a mandatory range of punishment? Subsidiary question: whether the case should be remanded in light of United States v. Haymond, __U.S.__, 139 S.Ct. 2369 (2019)? ii
Docket Entries
2019-10-21
Petition DENIED.
2019-10-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/18/2019.
2019-09-27
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-09-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 21, 2019)
Attorneys
Marco Antonio Murillo
Kevin Joel Page — Office of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
Kevin Joel Page — Office of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent