No. 19-6392
Jeffrey F. Evers v. Brian Foster, Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appeals civil-procedure civil-rights criminal-procedure due-process federal-courts first-amendment free-exercise habeas-corpus merits-based-decision new-trial procedural-default public-accommodation religious-freedom same-sex-marriage standing state-licensing
Latest Conference:
2019-12-06
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does federal law under A952(c) permit a civil justice system to respond to a No-Merits review of a procedural default that can only be waived as a merits-based decision to respect all claims raised that were never decided?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED \. Does federal law under A952(¢) germ a Ciscanil yusbice a Cc Va Sam UE 5 espondiag to a NaMery weno Q LOe A> V if a oroccdnural default} ait onl be we OA AS A Me -~hased ? a Noa ‘ 4 ‘ N we d decision ito cesbeck oP al\ clayons caises\ ‘hay Evers” a A. __Does ne WEN Peoendmoeny allow the Orosafvon ko Se a Oa RR 2. Dees |e, Sixty Aroendene ty ates Yoo. Corfrasfabion Cabs, a \\ ons Xe Nees cw a a og credible a TO nn a a TT I
Docket Entries
2019-12-09
Petition DENIED.
2019-11-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/6/2019.
2019-11-05
Waiver of right of respondent Brian Foster to respond filed.
2019-07-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 25, 2019)