No. 19-6415
Jose Eleuterio Nava v. United States
Tags: appellate-review criminal-procedure deference district-court due-process judicial-discretion sentencing-factors sentencing-review substantive-reasonableness
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2019-12-06
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether substantive reasonableness review necessarily encompasses some degree of reweighing the sentencing factors?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether substantive reasonableness review necessarily encompasses some degree of reweighing the sentencing factors? i PARTIES Jose Eleuterio Nava, is the petitioner, who was the defendant-appellant below. The United States of America is the respondent, and was the plaintiff-appellee in both cases below. ii
Docket Entries
2019-12-09
Petition DENIED.
2019-11-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/6/2019.
2019-11-04
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-10-24
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 29, 2019)
Attorneys
Jose Eleuterio Nava
Christopher A. Curtis — Federal Public Defender's Office, Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent