Whether the challenged records used to make an adverse determination against me are indeed inaccurate and/or incomplete as a matter of this U.S. Supreme Court's case law, statute and record

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW : I argued in the DC District Court and Court-Of-Appeals that the prison's Staff did not take the required reasonable steps, to verify the challenged inaccurate and/or incomplete information (Total Loss Amount and My Citizenship) used to make an adverse determination against me, in accordance —_ with the Privacy-Act, and its own policy statement, as I requested. In light of the lower Courts' decision in this matter, which conflicts with other Circuits holding, and the relevant decision of this United States Supreme Court, the questions I now present are as follow : 1, Whether the challenged records used to make an adverse determination against me are indeed inaccurate and/or incomplete as a matter of this U.S. Supreme Court's case law, statute and record. : 2, Whether the prison's Staff took the required reasonable steps to verify the accuracy and/or completeness of the challenged records, used to make an adverse determination against me, in accordance with the relevant decisions of this U.S. Supreme Court, other Circuit Courts, the Privacy , Act (PA), and its own policy statement. 3, Whether regulation that exempts the Bureau Of Prisons (BOP) from the provision of the Privacy Act (PA) regarding amendment of inaccurate records, is tantamount to an exemption of of the BOP from: — , the provision creating the duty to accurately maintain records used in making adverse determinations against me, as required by the relevant decisions of other Circuit, and this U.S. Supreme Court. ° 4, Whether the District Court can sit as trier of fact, of disputed declaration/A ffidavits when there are genuine disputed issues of dispositive material fact and a jury demand in this case. 5, Whether THE GEO GROUP, INC., (GEO) is to be treated as an Agency for purpose of the Privacy Act (PA) because of its substantial independence, in the carrying out of its administrative duties. 6, Whether my claims of human-trafficking, slave-labor, and discrimination based my on national origin, against THE GEO GROUP INC., are still cognizable under a different legal approach. i : PARTIES TO PROCEEDING: All parties do not appear in the case caption of the cover page. A list of all