Whether the federal court erred in upholding the petitioner's mandatory sentence for a drug-trafficking conviction under North Carolina General Statute 90-95(h), which the petitioner argues violates his due process rights under the Fourteenth Amendment

No question identified. : Que rtioalgy Pre canted I. The Fedral Conrt, Questiva Pre ceotec LS bohoth eo | re VYettionrl Mandatuyu Sentence + i¢ Drug — Tyalbicleinn Conviction; Sotence Yucsua N.C Gon, stat Jo-49 b. is. Protected by Liber sntere { Emaati ~UM he Due Prowss of im clause mcktanth Amend mat: 2 IL. The Federal Contt, Questor Pracented is \wthethe c The Due Procacs of Laws Clause Fur teenth Drrand mart PF Hed Poctuaat NVC, Gan, Stat, 90-95 (h ) Chape 960 ArteleS =» That Could Thy Habitual Felon bau Be Used To Enhanco The Mandatory rug ar vad{i ching Sentenced