No. 19-6547
Kevin Sterling v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: affirmance appeal appointed-counsel cja-18-usc-3006 criminal-justice-act criminal-procedure due-process fed-r-crim-p-44 federal-rules-criminal-procedure gideon-v-wainwright inability-to-pay legal-representation right-to-counsel writ-of-certiorari
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity
SocialSecurity
Latest Conference:
2019-12-06
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether defendant should have been appointed counsel
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Whether defendant should have been appointed counsel too Assist him in filing a writ of Certiorari, pursuant to the CJA 18 U.S.C. § 3006. . . and FED. R. Crim. P. 44, where after affirmance 6f; defendant's appeal,retained counsel stop representing defendant due to his inability to pay~ And this was in violation of 4HO4 U.S. 28-29 (1971) . Whether based on the facts of this case this court should Appoint Counsel to assist in seeking review for Certiorari ,m oe iy .
Docket Entries
2019-12-09
Petition DENIED.
2019-11-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/6/2019.
2019-11-18
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-07-19
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 9, 2019)
Attorneys
Kevin Sterling
Kevin Sterling — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent