No. 19-6586

Shane Inghels v. United States

Lower Court: Seventh Circuit
Docketed: 2019-11-12
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: 18-usc-924 armed-career-criminal-act categorical-approach controlled-substance criminal-statute divisibility indiana-code indiana-code-35-48-4-1.1 serious-drug-offense statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2020-02-21
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether a conviction for dealing in methamphetamine under Indiana Code § 35-48-4-1.1 is improperly considered a 'serious drug offense' under the Armed Career Criminal Act

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED Whether a conviction for dealing in methamphetamine under Indiana Code § 35-48-4-1.1 is improperly considered a “serious drug offense” under the Armed Career Criminal Act where the Indiana statute encompasses more conduct than “manufacturing, distributing, [and] possession with intent to manufacture or distribute, a controlled substance” as required by 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(2)(A)? ii

Docket Entries

2020-02-24
Petition DENIED.
2020-01-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/21/2020.
2020-01-13
Memorandum of respondent United States of America filed.
2019-12-12
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including January 13, 2020.
2019-12-11
Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 12, 2019 to January 13, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
2019-11-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 12, 2019)

Attorneys

Shane Inghels
Johanna Maria ChristiansenFederal Public Defender's Office, Petitioner
Johanna Maria ChristiansenFederal Public Defender's Office, Petitioner
United States of America
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent