No. 19-6586
Shane Inghels v. United States
IFP
Tags: 18-usc-924 armed-career-criminal-act categorical-approach controlled-substance criminal-statute divisibility indiana-code indiana-code-35-48-4-1.1 serious-drug-offense statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2020-02-21
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a conviction for dealing in methamphetamine under Indiana Code § 35-48-4-1.1 is improperly considered a 'serious drug offense' under the Armed Career Criminal Act
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether a conviction for dealing in methamphetamine under Indiana Code § 35-48-4-1.1 is improperly considered a “serious drug offense” under the Armed Career Criminal Act where the Indiana statute encompasses more conduct than “manufacturing, distributing, [and] possession with intent to manufacture or distribute, a controlled substance” as required by 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(2)(A)? ii
Docket Entries
2020-02-24
Petition DENIED.
2020-01-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/21/2020.
2020-01-13
Memorandum of respondent United States of America filed.
2019-12-12
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including January 13, 2020.
2019-12-11
Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 12, 2019 to January 13, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
2019-11-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 12, 2019)
Attorneys
Shane Inghels
Johanna Maria Christiansen — Federal Public Defender's Office, Petitioner
Johanna Maria Christiansen — Federal Public Defender's Office, Petitioner
United States of America
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent