Dannez W. Hunter v. Keith Rupert Murdoch, et al.
SocialSecurity Antitrust DueProcess Copyright Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Whether to establish 1866 Civil Rights Act, Title 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (a) against high-ranking government officials and officers of the court
Questions Presented Whether to establish 1866 Civil Rights Act, Title 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (a) against high-ranking government officials and officers of the court for dismantling RICO laws to the detriment of black nationals, while operating in concert to interfere with interstate and foreign commerce by the unlawful collection of debt in the amount of $305,000 plus six-years interest using a Department of Justice email? Whether Judge Nancy E. Brasel violated 18 U.S.c. § 1962(b), and my civil rights under the color of law by sanctioning Petitioner for adhering to Judge Terry J. Hatter’s “Order” to state 20 detailed points for predicate acts , of RICO in the case of Sophia Stewart vs. Warner Bros. Entertainment, Inc., 20th Century Fox Productions, James Cameron, et. al., No.: Docket 4? Whether Judge Nancy E. Brasel abused her authority by taking a bribe and directing 5 U.S. Marshals, 3 Court Deputies to block my entryway into the US District Court of Minnesota, while 4 St. Paul Police Officers observed, thus violated Chapter 73 Title 18 U.S.C. § 1509; in order to interfere with the ; enforcement of a $3,500,000,000.00 UCC Lien against Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc. and Twenty-First Century Fox, Inc? Whether the Judge Nancy Brasel, abused her authority illegally “immunizing” Fox and Warner Bros. for using “instrumentalities” of State and Executive Branch to steal a copyright in violation of 17 U.S.C. § 511(a) (b)? i