No. 19-6630

Dannez W. Hunter v. Keith Rupert Murdoch, et al.

Lower Court: Eighth Circuit
Docketed: 2019-11-14
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: 1866-civil-rights-act 42-usc-1981 civil-rights commerce commerce-interference copyright-infringement debt-collection interstate-commerce judicial-misconduct rico rico-statute title-42-usc-1981 ucc-lien
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Antitrust DueProcess Copyright Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2020-04-17 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether to establish 1866 Civil Rights Act, Title 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (a) against high-ranking government officials and officers of the court

Question Presented (from Petition)

Questions Presented Whether to establish 1866 Civil Rights Act, Title 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (a) against high-ranking government officials and officers of the court for dismantling RICO laws to the detriment of black nationals, while operating in concert to interfere with interstate and foreign commerce by the unlawful collection of debt in the amount of $305,000 plus six-years interest using a Department of Justice email? Whether Judge Nancy E. Brasel violated 18 U.S.c. § 1962(b), and my civil rights under the color of law by sanctioning Petitioner for adhering to Judge Terry J. Hatter’s “Order” to state 20 detailed points for predicate acts , of RICO in the case of Sophia Stewart vs. Warner Bros. Entertainment, Inc., 20th Century Fox Productions, James Cameron, et. al., No.: Docket 4? Whether Judge Nancy E. Brasel abused her authority by taking a bribe and directing 5 U.S. Marshals, 3 Court Deputies to block my entryway into the US District Court of Minnesota, while 4 St. Paul Police Officers observed, thus violated Chapter 73 Title 18 U.S.C. § 1509; in order to interfere with the ; enforcement of a $3,500,000,000.00 UCC Lien against Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc. and Twenty-First Century Fox, Inc? Whether the Judge Nancy Brasel, abused her authority illegally “immunizing” Fox and Warner Bros. for using “instrumentalities” of State and Executive Branch to steal a copyright in violation of 17 U.S.C. § 511(a) (b)? i

Docket Entries

2020-04-20
Rehearing DENIED.
2020-04-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/17/2020.
2020-02-21
Application (19A929) denied by Justice Gorsuch.
2020-02-13
Application (19A929) to file the petition for rehearing in excess of page limits, submitted to Justice Gorsuch.
2020-02-13
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2020-01-21
Petition DENIED.
2019-12-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/17/2020.
2019-11-25
Waiver of right of respondent Murdoch, Keith Rupert, et al. to respond filed.
2019-09-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 16, 2019)

Attorneys

Dannez W. Hunter
Dannez W. Hunter — Petitioner
Dannez W. Hunter — Petitioner
Murdoch, Keith Rupert, et al.
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent