No. 19-6636
Gregory Williams v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: circumstantial-evidence constitutional-rights due-process fair-trial jury-bias jury-instructions prosecutorial-misconduct sentencing sentencing-reasonableness
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2020-01-10
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the government violated Mr. Williams' constitutional right to a fair trial
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
No question identified. : STATEMENT OF THE ISSUE(S) I. WHETHER THE GOVERNMENT VIOLATED MR. WILLIAMS CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO A FAIR TRIAL, IN IT’S IMPROPER DIRECT QUESTIONING AND ILL-ADVISED POINTING OF A GUN TOWARD THE JURY BOX. I. WHETHER THE COURT IMPERMISSIBLY FAILED TO GRANT A NEW TRIAL IN A CASE WHICH IS EXTREMELY CIRCUMSTANTIAL. Il. WHETHER THE SENTENCE WAS SUBSTANTIVELY UNREASONABLE. i
Docket Entries
2020-01-13
Petition DENIED.
2019-12-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/10/2020.
2019-11-25
Waiver of right of respondent United States Of America to respond filed.
2019-11-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 16, 2019)
Attorneys
Gregory Williams
Noel Lawrence — LAW OFFICES OF NOEL G. LAWRENCE, P. A., Petitioner
United States Of America
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent