No. 19-6653
Quinton Omar Jackson v. United States
Tags: criminal-law criminal-statutes federal-criminal-law force force-and-violence intimidation legislative-intent mens-rea physical-force statutory-interpretation violence
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2020-01-10
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Congress intended the phrase 'by force and violence, or by intimidation,' that appears in multiple federal criminal statutes to include the use of violent, intentional physical force
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether Congress intended the phrase “by force and violence, or by intimidation,” that appears in multiple federal criminal statutes to include the use of violent, intentional physical force. prefix
Docket Entries
2020-01-13
Petition DENIED.
2019-12-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/10/2020.
2019-11-26
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2019-11-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 18, 2019)
Attorneys
Quinton Omar Jackson
Kara Lee Hartzler — Federal Defenders of San Diego, Inc., Petitioner
Kara Lee Hartzler — Federal Defenders of San Diego, Inc., Petitioner
United States of America
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent