Whether the refusal of the legal representative of the Petitioner to disclose a conflict of interest and the judge's failure to address this issue constituted a denial of access to the courts, due process, equal protection, and the right to conflict-free counsel, in violation of the Petitioner's 1st, 4th, 5th, 6th, 8th, 9th, and 14th Amendment rights

No question identified. : A.) ‘The Petitioner presents the inquiry unto the U.S.Ct, vbether the refusal of the legal representative (sic) of the Petitioner during arraignment, motions to supress eviderce, discovery, trail, sentencing, & all related post-trial court remedies to appraise the Petitioner of said comsels (sic) conflict of interest in being an agent of the government, (&) the jucke(s) presiding over said criminal court proceedings refusal to admonish the Petitioner of said, & either (a) obtain a waiver of the Petitioner for said conflict of interest or (b) allowing a release from the court & the government to sever the conflict of interest by said legal representative (sic) of the Petitioner constituted, denyal of access to the courts, denyal of fair & adiquite due probess of law, denyal of equal protection of the laws, denyal. of an impartial adjudication, violated the Petitionaxs tight to conflict free legal representation, violated the Petitioners Yight to be free from cruel & unusual punishtent as a result of the unlawful criminal conviction & senteme where the Petitioner was illegally detained within the IDOC for approximately a twenty six (26) year period of time, (&) where the miscondct of the juge(s) & officers of the courts gave rise to a criminal conspiracy blatantly violating the Petitioners 1st, 4th, Sth, 6th 8th, 9th & 14th amendment Rights under the U.S. Constitution warrenting a verdict voiding & rullifying the Petitioners criminal conwiction § sentence, (&) also justifying the Petitioners inmediate discharge fron the custody of the ID0C. . LIST.OF ALL PARTIES: B.) ‘The caption page of this petition does not include ay parties, as the Petitioners state hbeas corpus petition has been transfered from judge to judge as a floater case, & the Petitioner is cuccently ue capacity which enconpassess all jurges sitting in said judges stead or supersading said jude for the purposes of sexvice & jurisdiction pertaining to this matter in controversy. : 2 of 13 ,