No. 19-6853

Nhuong Van Nguyen v. Jackson Lucky, et al.

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2019-12-04
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: civil-procedure court-judgment court-of-appeals due-process federal-rules-of-civil-procedure fraud fraud-upon-court fraud-upon-the-court judicial-misconduct legal-remedy motion-to-vacate rule-60 standing
Key Terms:
Securities
Latest Conference: 2020-02-21
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the District Court and the court of Appeals correctly rejected petitioner's claim that the United States committed 'FRAUD UPON THE COURT?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED Whether the District Court and the court of Appeals correctly rejected petitioner’s claim _ that the United States committed “FRAUD UPON THE COURT”? i 2. , Fraud upon the court is one of the most serious violations that can occur in a court of laws. This fraud upon the court case is well proved by clear and convincing evidence. If Jackson Lucky was not committed Fraud upon the court, he has already put me in jail? For calumniate him? . 3. FEDERAL RULE CIVIL PROCEDURE, RULE 60 (d) (3) states that nothing in rule 60 limits a court’s power to set aside a judgment for Fraud upon the court? : 4. FRAUD UPON THE COURT is proved; FRCP rule 60 (d) (3) is provided; Motion to . vacate the judgment for fraud upon the court is applied. What happens to the perpetrator? Pageii

Docket Entries

2020-02-24
Petition DENIED.
2020-01-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/21/2020.
2019-09-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 3, 2020)

Attorneys

Nhuong V. Nguyen
Nhuong V. Nguyen — Petitioner
Nhuong V. Nguyen — Petitioner