Whether the Fourth Circuit should be required to use the categorical approach, applying the parameters set by this Court, to its determination that a prior conviction is a 'serious drug offense' under the Armed Career Criminal Act and a controlled substance offense pursuant to U.S.S.G. §4B1.1

QUESTIONS PRESENTED L Whether the Fourth Circuit should be required to use the categorical approach, applying the parameters set by this Court, to its determination that a prior conviction is a “serious drug offense” under the Armed Career Criminal Act and a controlled substance offense pursuant to U.S.S.G. §4B1.1. Il. Whether this Court should revisit its holding in Custis v. United States, 511 U.S. 485 (1994), as discussed in the dissent in this Court’s Daniels v. United States, 532 U.S. 374, 383 (2001) opinion, to allow collateral challenges under the circumstances present here, where the law created by the Fourth Circuit’s opinion holds that Petitioner was subjected to an unconstitutional state conviction, but he was never afforded the opportunity to challenge the conviction as unconstitutional. i