No. 19-7040
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: criminal-defense criminal-law criminal-liability criminal-procedure due-process entrapment factual-disputes jury-trial objective-entrapment state-law trial-by-jury trial-court-proceedings
Key Terms:
DueProcess Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
DueProcess Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2020-02-21
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Where state law recognizes objective entrapment as a complete defense to criminal liability, and that defense turns on disputed issues of fact, does removing the defense from the province of the jury deprive a defendant of due process and violate the right to trial by jury?
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTION PRESENTED Where state law recognizes objective entrapment as a complete defense to criminal liability, and that defense turns on disputed issues of fact, does removing the defense from the province of the jury deprive a defendant of due process and violate the right to trial by jury?
Docket Entries
2020-02-24
Petition DENIED.
2020-01-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/21/2020.
2020-01-27
Waiver of right of respondent Florida to respond filed.
2019-12-03
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 21, 2020)
Attorneys
Dalia Dippolito
Gregory Curtis Rosenfeld — Law Offices of Greg Rosenfeld, P.A., Petitioner
Gregory Curtis Rosenfeld — Law Offices of Greg Rosenfeld, P.A., Petitioner
Florida