No. 19-7040

Dalia A. Dippolito v. Florida

Lower Court: Florida
Docketed: 2019-12-20
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: criminal-defense criminal-law criminal-liability criminal-procedure due-process entrapment factual-disputes jury-trial objective-entrapment state-law trial-by-jury trial-court-proceedings
Key Terms:
DueProcess Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2020-02-21
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Where state law recognizes objective entrapment as a complete defense to criminal liability, and that defense turns on disputed issues of fact, does removing the defense from the province of the jury deprive a defendant of due process and violate the right to trial by jury?

Question Presented (from Petition)

QUESTION PRESENTED Where state law recognizes objective entrapment as a complete defense to criminal liability, and that defense turns on disputed issues of fact, does removing the defense from the province of the jury deprive a defendant of due process and violate the right to trial by jury?

Docket Entries

2020-02-24
Petition DENIED.
2020-01-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/21/2020.
2020-01-27
Waiver of right of respondent Florida to respond filed.
2019-12-03
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 21, 2020)

Attorneys

Dalia Dippolito
Gregory Curtis RosenfeldLaw Offices of Greg Rosenfeld, P.A., Petitioner
Gregory Curtis RosenfeldLaw Offices of Greg Rosenfeld, P.A., Petitioner
Florida
Carla Suzanne BechardOffice of the Attorney General, State of Florida, Respondent
Carla Suzanne BechardOffice of the Attorney General, State of Florida, Respondent