No. 19-7072
Tyrone Walker v. United States
Tags: 18-usc-924 18-usc-924(c)(3)(a) actual-or-threatened-force crime-of-violence criminal-law federal-jurisdiction hobbs-act physical-force property-crime property-rights sentencing-enhancement statutory-interpretation stokeling-v-united-states
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities
SocialSecurity Securities
Latest Conference:
2020-01-24
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the substantive offense of Hobbs Act robbery is categorically a 'crime of violence' for purposes of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(3)(A)
Question Presented (from Petition)
Issues Presented 1. Whether the substantive offense of Hobbs Act robbery is categorically a “crime of violence” for purposes of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(3)(A). 2. Whether Hobbs Act robbery can realistically be committed by means of actual or threatened force against a person’s property that does not involve the minimum quantum of physical force required by Stokeling v. United States. i
Docket Entries
2020-01-27
Petition DENIED.
2020-01-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/24/2020.
2020-01-06
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2019-12-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 27, 2020)
Attorneys
Tyrone Walker
John Andrew Kuchera — Attorney at Law, Petitioner
John Andrew Kuchera — Attorney at Law, Petitioner
United States of America
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent