No. 19-7160

Ernest J. Espinoza v. Matt A. Ashe, et al.

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2020-01-02
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: civil-procedure due-process free-speech patent. standing takings appeal case-statement civil-procedure constitutional-provisions due-process filing-deadlines jurisdiction standing statutory-interpretation statutory-provisions supreme-court writ-petition
Latest Conference: 2020-02-28
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether civil-procedure rules (including appeal windows) take precedence over statutory filing deadlines

Question Presented (from Petition)

No question identified. : _ i US Supremne Court Wastin gto Oc 20543 . _ O uestion (s Peegented ; fC WsheWe Cost’ proce Aunts (Declines 4 _ NApgeck windowWS ) Take pos Comebe nt oe : _~ Ti+‘@ Pearce eff icon Has aADAT ern : L OSHa i Oce’ Yous Music COW rarrts QimSs Stars Ayud terial AF Aics Ei NCSI 710) Be Low ed te Be ; | LCastl Pitts Super cocd/) te __ Onuttedk (+5 20 e, © at ng | en ee — _. _ Ss [2 BaTSOSS _—— . J au aarti appear in cnn tt sas on tne se ome o we, 7 ; ; , | peLare cass th tet Ly No. Iq ~| p bY cave Conte “30 F. 1h Cea —6gl SSI (9% ie 1483 0, NO |. /b ev 00193 JET nee © Kern Conrcty Caperies Co Wit AUS) 0 SRhgost ll yols BFISTOIGA Brrr ghd bf} BF ISI SPADA owl Rodis BIE pice Pack on CHP fe 3

Docket Entries

2020-03-02
Petition DENIED.
2020-02-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/28/2020.
2019-12-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 3, 2020)

Attorneys

Ernest J. Espinoza
Ernest J. Espinoza — Petitioner
Ernest J. Espinoza — Petitioner