| 21-5947 |
Jorge Petter v. United States |
Fourth Circuit |
2021-10-13 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
court-of-appeals covid-19 due-process fifth-amendment filing-deadlines incarcerated-filers pandemic-response standing-order |
Whether the Court of Appeals violated the petitioner's due process rights under the Fifth Amendment by failing to issue a standing order extending fil… |
| 21-5310 |
Marcus Daniel Silver v. Bertram Siegel, et al. |
California |
2021-08-06 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
30-day-rule civil-procedure federal-court-procedure filing-deadlines jurisdictional-deadline notice-of-removal receipt-of-complaint service-of-process statutory-interpretation |
When does the deadline to file for Notice of Removal begin? |
| 19-7967 |
Kenneth Durant v. Frank Lawrence, Warden |
Seventh Circuit |
2020-03-11 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
access-to-courts appellate-counsel appellate-procedure constitutional-rights filing-deadlines habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel legal-remedy procedural-due-process right-to-counsel tolling |
Whether the petitioner was denied effective assistance of trial counsel and appellate counsel, and whether the petitioner was denied access to the cou… |
| 19-7160 |
Ernest J. Espinoza v. Matt A. Ashe, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2020-01-02 |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-procedure due-process free-speech patent. standing takings appeal case-statement civil-procedure constitutional-provisions due-process filing-deadlines jurisdiction standing statutory-interpretation statutory-provisions supreme-court writ-petition |
Whether civil-procedure rules (including appeal windows) take precedence over statutory filing deadlines |
| 18-9413 |
Hozay Royal v. Gurbir Grewal, Attorney General of New Jersey, et al. |
Third Circuit |
2019-05-24 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
28-usc-2107 appeal-deadline appeals civil-procedure federal-rules-of-appellate-procedure filing-deadlines mail-filing notice-of-appeal postmark statutory-interpretation time-computation time-limits |
Does the thirty-day period under 28 U.S.C. § 2107 and Fed.R.App.Proc. 4(a)(1)(A) allow for the notice of appeal to be filed in the United States Distr… |
| 18-5032 |
Ramon Vasquez v. City of Reading, Pennsylvania, et al. |
Pennsylvania |
2018-06-28 |
Denied |
IFP |
access-to-courts civil-procedure constitutional-rights due-process filing-deadlines habeas-corpus houston-v-lack judicial-discretion nunc-pro-tunc prisoner-filing pro-se standing sua-sponte-dismissal |
Whether the state Supreme Court's decision to deny Vasquez's petition for Allowance of Appeal 'Nunc Pro Tunc' conflicts with the Supreme Court's prece… |