No. 19-7166
Ann Karnofel v. Superior Waterproofing, Inc.
Relisted (2)IFP
Tags: access-to-courts age-discrimination civil-procedure civil-rights due-process fair-trial pro-se standing
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2020-04-17
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Were the petitioner's due process rights denied because she is a 47-year-old, female pro se litigant?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED \Were. Le titioner's clue. PrecesS RIEh+S denied, hecause she is a 47-vear-old, female PRO Ye litigant ° Did A PRo ve liticant Receive A Fare DAY IN the Lower Couels 2
Docket Entries
2020-04-20
Rehearing DENIED.
2020-04-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/17/2020.
2020-03-23
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2020-03-02
Petition DENIED.
2020-02-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/28/2020.
2019-12-27
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 3, 2020)
Attorneys
Ann Karnofel
Ann Karnofel — Petitioner