Whether the four discrete events Petitioner raised in opposing Respondents' Motion for Summary Judgment constituted adverse actions in accordance with the spirit and intent of Title VII retaliations claims, a remedial statute?

QUESTION PRESENTED (i) Whether the four discrete events Petitioner raised in opposing Respondents’ Motion for Summary Judgment constituted adverse actions in accordance with the spirit and intent of Title VII retaliations claims, a remedial statute? (ii) Whether Petitioner raised sufficient evidence of pretext to defeat Respondents’ Motion for Summary Judgment? ii STATEMENT OF RELATED CASES Arakaki v. Brennan, No. 15-00229 HG-RLP United States District Court For the District of Hawai‘i Judgment entered March 31, 2017 Arakaki v. Brennan, No. 17-15885 United States Court of Appeals For the Ninth Circuit Opinion entered June 12, 2019 Order Denying Motion for Rehearing and Motion for Rehearing En Banc, entered September 5, 2019