No. 19-7266
Mickie Stone v. Centene Corporation
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: 11-usc-1915-e-2-b appellate-procedure civil-rights due-process eeoc eeoc-complaint eleventh-circuit frivolous-appeal frivolous-claim in-forma-pauperis standing statute-of-limitations tolling
Latest Conference:
2020-11-06
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Court in the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit erred in denying my motion for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis, by claiming it was frivolous, and incorrectly citing Napier v. Preslicka, 314 F.3d 528, 531 (11th Cir. 2002); 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS FOR REVIEW Whether the Court in the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh . Circuit erred in denying my motion for leave to proceed on appeal in forma | pauperis, by claiming it wal rvotous, hd incorrectly citing Napier v. Preslicka, > 31434528, 531 (11 Cir.2002); USC. § 1915(e)(2(B). | . |
Docket Entries
2020-11-09
Motion for leave to file a petition for rehearing filed by petitioner DENIED.
2020-10-21
Motion DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/6/2020.
2020-10-07
Motion for leave to file a petition for rehearing filed by petitioner.
2020-02-24
Petition DENIED.
2020-02-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/21/2020.
2020-02-01
Waiver of right of respondent Centene Corporation to respond filed.
2019-04-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 13, 2020)
Attorneys
Centene Corporation
Gail Golman Holtzman — Jackson Lewis P.C., Respondent
Gail Golman Holtzman — Jackson Lewis P.C., Respondent