No. 19-732
Richard Natofsky v. City of New York
Tags: ada adverse-employment-action americans-with-disabilities-act burden-of-proof burden-shifting but-for-causation causation-standard civil-rights disability-discrimination employment-discrimination employment-law mixed-motive mixed-motive-causation
Key Terms:
Arbitration SocialSecurity ERISA EmploymentDiscrimina
Arbitration SocialSecurity ERISA EmploymentDiscrimina
Latest Conference:
2020-04-17
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Americans with Disabilities Act permits employees to proceed under a mixed-motive causation standard before the burden shifts to employers to ultimately prove that a non-disability based reason was the but-for cause of the adverse employment action
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Whether the Americans with Disabilities Act permits employees to proceed under a mixed-motive causation standard before the burden shifts to employers to ultimately prove that a non-disability based reason was the but-for cause of the adverse employment action.
Docket Entries
2020-04-20
Petition DENIED.
2020-03-25
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/17/2020.
2020-03-20
Reply of petitioner Richard Natofsky filed.
2020-03-05
Brief of respondent City of New York in opposition filed.
2020-01-03
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including March 5, 2020.
2019-12-30
Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 9, 2020, to March 5, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
2019-12-06
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 9, 2020)
2019-09-30
Application (19A349) granted by Justice Ginsburg extending the time to file until December 6, 2019.
2019-09-25
Application (19A349) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from October 7, 2019 to December 6, 2019, submitted to Justice Ginsburg.
Attorneys
City of New York
Richard Paul Dearing — New York City Law Department, Respondent
Richard Paul Dearing — New York City Law Department, Respondent
Melanie West — Respondent
Melanie West — Respondent
Richard Natofsky