No. 19-7409
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: 2nd-amendment criminal-law criminal-statute due-process firearm firearm-display physical-force statutory-interpretation violent-felony
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
AdministrativeLaw SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2020-05-01
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Do criminal statutes that prohibit angry or threatening firearm displays not targeted at a specific victim qualify as a 'violent felony' having as an element 'the use . . . of physical force against the person of another' within 18 U.S.C. §924(e)(2)(B)(i)?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED Do criminal statutes that prohibit angry or threatening firearm displays not targeted at a specific victim qualify as a “violent felony” having as an element “the use . . . of physical force against the person of another” within 18 U.S.C. §924(e)(2)(B)(i)? 2
Docket Entries
2020-05-04
Rehearing DENIED.
2020-04-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/1/2020.
2020-04-02
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2020-03-09
Petition DENIED.
2020-02-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/6/2020.
2020-02-14
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-01-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 24, 2020)
Attorneys
Melvin Pryor
Felicia Jones — Federal Public Defender's Office, Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent