Carol Bangura v. Pennsylvania, et al.
SocialSecurity EmploymentDiscrimina
Did the Appeals Court conduct a full review of the record submitted to the panel?
QUESTIONS PRESENTED e Did the Appeals Court conduct a full review of the record submitted to the panel on December 2, 2019 prior to the Per Curiam opinion issued one day later on December 3, ; 2019? | e Was the lower court record reviewed in the light most favorable to Petitioner Essex Ins. | Co. v. Barrett Moving & Storage, Inc., 885 F.3d 1292, 1299 (11th Cir. 2018)? e Did the Petitioner establish prima facie and casual connections between her protected . , activities and adverse actions by both sets of Respondents reviewed and ruled on? : e Did Respondents provide non-discriminatory or non-retaliatory reasons for their nine adverse actions against Petitioner after Judge Legrome Davis’ ruling that prima facie was . established? e Did Robert Kline, an Accountant and unpaid member of the Pennsylvania Senate . Democratic Caucus have legal authority to terminate Petitioner? ; , ; e Was there a causal connection between Petitioner’s email on September 11, 2014 and her termination by Robert Kline on September 12, 2014? : e Did Petitioner’s termmation follow Pennsylvania Senate termmation policies? e Did Petitioner’s termination follow PA Senate policies and procedures? e Were reasonable comparators offered by Petitioner reviewed? And was Petitioner treated . oe |