Whether state actors acting under color of state law can impair, impede, deny, discriminate, threaten or otherwise obstruct petitioners' federally protected rights

No question identified. : . 1. Can state actors acting under color of state law, impair, impede, deny, discriminate, threaten or otherwise obstruct petitioners’/ plaintiffs’ free excise of federally protected rights and or . federally protected common law rights under The-Constitution of the United-States? 2. Can state actors acting under color of state law have absolute or quasi judicial immunity for their illegal actions against petitioners’/ plaintiffs’ rights protected under The-Constitution of the United-States? 3. Should the Courts’ in a color of law case grant absolute or quasi judicial immunity without the respondents/ defendants asking for it or even answering the civil complaint while making rulings based on speculation and conjecture by denying all hearings? 4. Can the Courts’ deny the petitioners’ rights to answer respondents motions, allow respondents to threaten and intimidate witnesses of an active case, allow obstruction of justice and rule on the case by assuming facts not in evidence without due process and equal protection of law? : 5. Should this Supreme-Court allow the respondents’/ defendants’ to argue the original complaint when none of the ever answered the original complaint in the trial court and fell into default judgment? ; 6. Can the 11" Amendment extend immunity over Article III section 2 paragraph 2 and Article VI paragraph 2 treaties protected by The-Constitution of the United-States when the respondent state actors acting under color of state law broke their oath of office? . ; ii LIST-OF-PARTIES [ ] All parties appear in the caption of the case on the cover page. [X] All parties do not appear in the caption of the case on the cover page. A list of all