No. 19-7736
Silvester Woods v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, et al.
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: administrative-law civil-procedure civil-rights complaint court-of-appeals damages district-court due-process emotional-distress employment intentional-infliction-of-emotional-distress jurisdiction representation standing
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity LaborRelations EmploymentDiscrimina
SocialSecurity LaborRelations EmploymentDiscrimina
Latest Conference:
2020-11-13
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the WMATA and ATU Local 689 presented unjustified excuses to reinstate the plaintiff and deny representation, and whether the district court and appeals court erred in dismissing the complaint
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
No question identified. :
Docket Entries
2020-11-16
Motion for leave to file a petition for rehearing filed by petitioner DENIED.
2020-10-28
Motion DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/13/2020.
2020-10-20
Motion for leave to file a petition for rehearing filed by petitioner.
2020-04-20
Petition DENIED.
2020-04-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/17/2020.
2020-03-18
Waiver of right of respondent Local 689, Amalgamated Transit Union to respond filed.
2020-03-03
Waiver of right of respondent Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority to respond filed.
2020-02-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 23, 2020)
Attorneys
Local 689, Amalgamated Transit Union
Paul M. Tyler — Gromfine, Taylor and Tyler, P.C., Respondent
Silvester Woods
Silvester Woods — Petitioner
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority