No. 19-776

James Wesley Amonett, Jr. v. Virginia

Lower Court: Virginia
Docketed: 2019-12-18
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: contract-enforcement contract-law criminal-procedure criminal-procedure-contract-enforcement due-process jury-trial law-enforcement plea-bargaining police-authority police-promises right-to-jury-trial sixth-amendment
Key Terms:
DueProcess CriminalProcedure
Latest Conference: 2020-01-10
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the police can promise someone who they have arrested a specific benefit in exchange for the arrestee's cooperation and whether that contract (offer and acceptance) is enforceable

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

Questions Presented Issue 1. There is an important, recurring issue on which the Federal circuits and the states’ highest courts are split, i.e. whether the police can promise someone who they have arrested a specific benefit in exchange for the arrestee’s cooperation and whether that contract (offer and acceptance) is enforceable. a. Can the government escape responsibility for the promises made by the police and accepted by the arrestee by claiming that the police lacked the authority to make such promises? b. Does this Court’s ruling in Frazier v. Cupp, 394 U.S. 731, 89 S.Ct. 1420, 22 L.Ed.2d 684 (1969) that police may misrepresent the facts they know mean that the police can misrepresent their authority to make agreements with someone they have arrested? c. Should Santobello v. New York, 404 U.S. 257 (1971) apply to promises made by the police, accepted by the arrestee and upon which the arrestee relies to his detriment? Issue 2. Whether, under the Right to Trial by Jury Clause of the Sixth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States, a defendant is entitled to have a jury determine the factual issue of whether the police and the defendant entered into a binding contract,and whether the contract has been breached. ii Parties The parties to this case are petitioner James Wesley Amonett, Jr. and the Commonwealth of Virginia. Corporate Disclosure There are no corporations involved in this case. List of Proceedings 1. In the Fairfax Circuit Court: Commonwealth v. Amonett, No. FE-2016-0001157: a. Trial— March 14-15, 2017; b. Sentencing — July 7, 2017; c. Notice of Appeal filed — July 11, 2017. 2. In the Virginia Court of Appeals: Amonett v. Commonwealth, Record No. 1613-17-4: a. Petition for writ of Error filed November 15, 2017; granted in part and denied in part, by judge -May 3, 2018; granted in part an denied in part, by panel, September 18, 2018; b. Disposition, affirmed by published opinion, 70 Va.App. 1, 823 S.E.2d 504 (Va. App. 2019) — February 19, 2019; c. Notice of Appeal filed — March 21, 2019. iii 3. In the Supreme Court of Virginia: Amonett v. Commonwealth, SCV Record # 190363: a. Petition filed — March 21, 2019; b. Petition refused — September 13, 2019.

Docket Entries

2020-01-13
Petition DENIED.
2019-12-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/10/2020.
2019-12-19
Waiver of right of respondent Virginia to respond filed.
2019-12-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 17, 2020)

Attorneys

James Wesley Amonett Jr
Marvin David MillerThe Law Offices of Marvin D. Miller, Petitioner
Marvin David MillerThe Law Offices of Marvin D. Miller, Petitioner
Virginia
Toby Jay HeytensOffice of the Attorney General, Respondent
Toby Jay HeytensOffice of the Attorney General, Respondent