Whether the City's 1 % year-long custom of illegal seizure, fraudulent post-storage notice, denied hearing, turning a blind eye and auction of Petitioner's pick-up truck, and/or, the judge's granting case-dispositive pretrial motion in limine, trial-exclusion of probative evidence and preclusion of a jury trial by a non-suit ruling, and/or appellate indifference toward Petitioner's §1983 municipal liability theory of unconstitutional custom and affirmation of the judicial errors, violated his state and federal rights and due process?

Questions Presented: 1. Due Process: (a) Whether the City’s 1 % year-long custom of illegal seizure, fraudulent poststorage notice, denied hearing, turning a blind eye and auction of Petitioner’s pick-up truck, and/or, (b) the judge’s granting case-dispositive pretrial motion in limine, trial-exclusion of probative evidence and preclusion of a jury trial by a non-suit ruling, and/or (c) appellate indifference toward Petitioner’s §1983 municipal liability theory of unconstitutional custom and affirmation of the judicial errors, violated his state and federal rights and due process? 2. Discrimination: Whether the Courts violated Petitioner’s state and federal ADA Civil Rights when the trial court denied his three ADA requests for accommodation, and/or, when the appellate court claimed Petitioner forfeited his ADA rights by complying with the judge’s , demand that he proceed to trial, despite his exacerbated disabilities? 3. Retroactivity: Whether new laws are retroactively applicable during adjudication? . ii ae, Soi