No. 19-7898
Richard C. Murphy v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: abuse-of-discretion appeals appellate-review attorney-client attorney-client-relationship civil-procedure civil-rights counsel-ethics due-process judicial-discretion legal-ethics legal-representation procedural-integrity representation standing
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities
SocialSecurity Securities
Latest Conference:
2020-04-03
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the Third Circuit Court of Appeals abuse their discretion by allowing counsel to continue representation after counsel documented his unwillingness to represent Petitioner?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
No question identified. : QUESTION Did the Third Circuit Court of Appeals abuse their discretion by allowing counsel to ‘continue representation after counsel documented his unwillingness to represent Petitioner?
Docket Entries
2020-04-06
Petition DENIED.
2020-03-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/3/2020.
2020-03-12
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-02-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 6, 2020)
Attorneys
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent