Is it constitutional to discriminate between natural-born U.S. persons?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED | C4.) Ace Neterat boty U.S persons Past of “THE Ptople and Cc, beqens. | (2) £5 f4 constitetonal to dis triminate between Natuta | born US. Persons ? (3) gre Gon-Controf Lauss Ua ton Shitehonal ? | (4) pte vehag RIGAtS Restrechons over Pudlc offenses va Constitenional ? (5) gre Back around «checks un Coast teh'ong/ ? (e) Ate Registra hon oF Fyre arms v9 Lon d5h'tuh'ona/ ? . (2) Are Cun-Conto] laws an inFevagemeat an Ind Pmendment of the US. Const fupior? (8) pre vodhng Restithoas an abndeemert on 6 Amend. “5, const? ok. (4) Ate armed ¢/4e2e15 a detrend? te Crime ? , (10) Does the Conshbdon GET EOF a He befween type firearms the People Can bear ? ; : i) Does the Conshtvhon define which from fhe People Can pear aims? (12) Are denysng Voting RG4tS from any Cy t2en ConshWhione/ oO (3) pees He U5, Const, dnd Amend, allow deny,»p Cook ghts from Netora/ : born as, Persons for pudle offense loovthong? . (4) Ate Sneek n peek werttantS & vrolefisn oa Wt Amend, US, Const ? CS) Are warrantless smfcisorments on PlesumPbon of teres f Com BEM ona ? UG) By the US const, 15 sf an absolute Right of the Peopl. t bear Arms? (7) Are il Natues( bor, US Persons pack of the people 2