Did the 8th Circuit Court of Appeals err in concluding that the mere presence or possession of guns/weapons seen in plain view and registered to the legal owner are grounds for suspicion and/or criminal activity, justifying prolonged traffic stops?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED I. Did the 8th cir. court of appeals error when they concluded that the ~ mere presents or possession of guns/weapons that are seen in plain view and registered . to the legal owner are grounds for suspicious and/or criminal activities , for probable cause to prolong a traffic stop for failure to signal? II. Did the. 8th cir. court of appeals error when they gave a inaccurate on the denial of my appeal? III. Did the 8th cir. court of appeals error when they did not respond to the issue of the prolonged stop due to the deviation from the stops purpose? IV. Did the 8th cir. court of appeals error when they decided not to recognize what ravroutine traffic. stop consist of? V. Did the 8th cir. court of appeals error when it concluded that sworn officers trial testimony that contradicted Prior testimony and prior reports did not violate constitutional rights ? VI. Did the 8th cir. court of appeals error when they did not acknowledge a problem with officers getting together to igure out what “ actually “ happened the day of the stop. As to who saw what take place during surveillance. VII. Did the 8th cir. court of appeals error when they stated that the free air sniff was justified just because a driver/citizen denies consent to the search of their person or vehicle ? VIII. Did the 8th cir. court of appeals error when they concluded that the jury was made aware of its province to handle/correct false testimony ? i