No. 19-8601

William Cornell Walker v. Minnesota

Lower Court: Minnesota
Docketed: 2020-06-04
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: age-discrimination civil-rights due-process equal-protection exculpatory-evidence false-testimony jury jury-composition peer-selection police-misconduct racial-bias
Key Terms:
CriminalProcedure
Latest Conference: 2020-09-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether jurors twice your age can be considered your peers

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED ' 4. Whether jurors twice your age can be considered your peers. the jury of 12 were not my peers except for one or two I | has nothing to do with being your peer but everyone in the courtroom was Caucasion, except my mother, father and {. Not one single other race was available to have a chance to be on jury. 2. Should a police officer that lied in his Affividavit,falsely arrested me, assumed my charges after the accuser said | did not rape (force or threaten her) be able to testify in a trial for a differnent incident with the same person in a different state. | told my lawyer to cancel his testimony after | found out he was lying saying | confesse by Jara untill closer to trial. In his reports to police officer Langseth there is no mention of a confession from me. 3. Should evidence that supports your case and helps you defend yourself not be allowed. A sworn deposition, history of accussations of other men raping her. in court of appeals if there was found to be prosecutorial misconduct during chief in case and rebuttal. My trial lawyer did not object to this at the time even though | asked him to, do | have the right io try to prove by affadavits, preliminary reports in another state to argue | think would help prove | did not make post miranda statements about assaulting accuser in Minnesota. Nowhere in chief Langseths probable cause, primary narrative did chie mention that | made post miranda statements confessing to Minnesota incident.

Docket Entries

2020-10-05
Petition DENIED.
2020-06-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-06-16
Waiver of right of respondent Minnesota to respond filed.
2020-01-30
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 6, 2020)

Attorneys

Minnesota
Travis James SmithSmith & Johnson, Respondent
Travis James SmithSmith & Johnson, Respondent
William Cornell Walker
William Cornell Walker — Petitioner
William Cornell Walker — Petitioner