Whether a plaintiff-African American male has been denied due process and equal protection under the 14th Amendment and 42 U.S.C. § 1983 by Caucasian managers denying him employment opportunities

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Terrtionee , Dexeick ZU. MIEN Sx, Respect: ae) WBuIT HS Petition FoR GoRit OF CERTORAR FOODING, THE ONPoBcalen PES CORIOM OPINION OF OniteD STATES Covet oF CBPEAIS Fore THe Toot Cirouir CISMIESING SAtiau's ABPEA). QUESNONS PrREares Ae, Cottenhe “Pain FF -Ay Areican Arnuweiean Niale Has Beene Biased BY Caucasion | Manasees ctr Lunn cooed “WDREwING nee Cemeteend in RE YO USG Ode TT QOOd|e-1t ONd AA US.C62) T 62H; Fortteentore, THe CASE Hos WET TO Re “I DIRMISSED ID Uisteier Cover for THe Niiddle Wisneer oF Nc. CLG eu OObBT) ; MOREOVER, COUETHER U.S. Court OF Gppeals G2e IT DISUSSINS FALIEN'S NPAs OPPpos= TO oS SANS) ae) elm T> PROCEEDING reson TO A U8 S ONT THe TDereunation OF N.C. Disrmecr Covel