When a State Attorney General has been admitted to the Bar of this Court, and has sworn an oath to support the Constitution of the United States, does the attorney have a duty to know the Rules of Court?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 3 LN.) When a Store Attommey General he Deen aconted Admission To The 4 Bor of This Court, ond hes Staned on Ocdh of OPCs monic. AS) 5 Sopporr The Consritutian of The Uacted Stet yD eeS The ofTormne 6 hove a duty te Kilow tre Rules of Court 2 Wan attorne 7 WS Served With a NOTICE of the Piling ond docketine of a 8 Wareol habecs Cov in The USSC, Does The Court ond Tre 9 Petirioner have oa “Right to a Response ag Outlined in 10 Role 20.3 (6) ond Role lS ? 111d.) When a Stece Atromey General aS The Respondents ortorne of 12 Cecord, has previously returned A Wawer of The Respondents 13 Rights, in @ Cectiorari review (14-9590 and ts Subs quent 14 Given Nouce of the Piling ond docketing of a writ of Hehesd 15 CorpeS (is-sias) Vn The USSC, and does not Mle any brief o¢ 16 foriel vay Oppesition ond instead ceTUINS A Wower Ther clees| 17 Stete$ “Certorari" on iT | DoeS This Constitute *delibevere 18 indi fCerence "ond Jor *fardlore te respond? 19] 3. AT Wher po iS a Stere responsible Ae Lailure ro celease 20 a NnoalsecS Corps petitioner Theat cleecly has a trakt Te be 21 Celeosed sand By whase celesse ns objecTianS or OppsSiTIOn 22 hove been Siled whatsoever, having bee, Qwen Nomera 23 OPPorTumitieS w de So? 24 4+ The Petitioner claims The Courts yorsdiction under 2% OSC 25 S2a4| and alleges TheT Rionts Secured by The ConstitetTion 26 and laws of The United Stereo} were Violesed ancl Ther The 27 alleged violations were Commerted evygon3_ ALTInoe 28 Under The Color of State law and Ther The Previovds 1 CQQUESTION (S) PRESENTED (Coen) . 2 Lelemial of lhaheo’ Corus (\g-sias) wes HoT an adjodicotian on 3 | Tre mecirs ond asks: Since hic. Proceed inns except iw. © 4 | Cop wel Cese$ are experte: will This Cau Aocket Tris 5 | appéetion Cor exceptional wot of hebess Car pus ocsed on 6 @ ExPevrte Lerluve tw CeSpond ond for delibecte tack Cerence > 71S.) \ ere an “Acc. acence "excepto Aenrals of Audanzetua 8 To Gle Second of "“Suce Wwe” h.c. Petition) in 7 Fedevel Oistnct 9 Court ? ; 1016.) May ow Inc. petition be based on Cuil Riokts Vielerons ? one 11 Does Role 1S apply if Appect is from Lnteclocutrery cleeree of 12 Specially Constituted distner cou CIeMmenT tohich PT 13 Seruce of 42 USC 1983 on Ve LendeontS, on hald indeGnately ? 14 [7.) Con Tre (4th Amendment tolerate a Stare Crimine Convicts 15 cedicexed on deliberere deceptual? Such a untens le altemet we 16 Theotre$ ? Are Those Charged With Upholding The laws Brelalited Liom 17 delibecacly aloricer ine euidence ? Including evidence USed Te divect 18 verdicts of Quilt Lor untenchle alreanative Theories? After beth . 19 Sides have rested ? Including manipulation of trek Tronsey pT 20 vucy verdtet$ ocd ere. uch deny due Proces$S APPellare 21 Crary? 221%.) Ms aw yory verdior thet acqouu8 a Citen-o pe Chearacd 23 CrimeProof of The Priore Crimme foceed ing Ter munct Ay 24 vn Gaver ef Tye accused ? Even iff it hes heen Lravdvieat 25 Mani puleted 2 In a mahearous prosecut ga? 26 9) Can Tre USSC Tolercte a Citizen being held ty State Covtodyon 27 La Crimmeal Conviction Pledicered on delilberete deceytiond by Thoie Chersed 28 || To Upbold The lavalter The Jury fund person Not Guilty of The 1 CIUESTION(S) PRESENTED (Coat. -2|_checged China| offense Poo Oe 3 |_\0-) In The above Cirvcomstances with The Invyed Srere! 4 upreme Court, Grant a! Petites ho cErgcocdwety West sh 5 nalhesS Cor mS ond Order The release of ao Stare Prisaner 6 om iWeqgeal encl unConsrituTion<!| e@ Costdy 2 and 7 ‘ TAS NecesSery ts e Court oppor Counsel 2 8 OC Ocder Response Qule Wisi * etc. ? . 9 andl | or : 10 Con The Cour or Thi ostice iSSve a dewee 1 for The Petitioner's Felecte Thet Will become 12 Alo$olvTe ValeSS The adversly aflected part 13 Show The Court Why iT Should ke Ser 14 ASide WiThin a Speci Qed AmMovnT , 15 of Time ? 16 . 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 _ 25 . 26 : ; ) 27 28 |