| 24-6547 |
Mitchell S. Sanderson v. Janne Myrdal, et al. |
North Dakota |
2025-02-12 |
Denied |
IFP |
due-process judicial-oath jurisdiction rules-of-court service-of-process supremacy-clause |
Whether the Rules of Court must be followed by the Court and whether judges can violate their oath of office, due process, and the Supremacy Clause |
| 23-7769 |
In Re Johnny Smith |
|
2024-06-20 |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
bar-ethics court-rules criminal-procedure due-process indictment judicial-discretion judicial-misconduct legal-procedure prosecutorial-misconduct rule-of-court rules-of-court |
Question not identified |
| 23-5643 |
In Re Gregory Mercer |
|
2023-09-22 |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
appellate-jurisdiction assignments-of-error constitutional-rights due-process mandamus mandamus-writ procedural-rules rules-of-court supremacy-clause supreme-court-procedure |
Whether the Court of Appeals of Virginia impeded the appellate jurisdiction of the Supreme Court of Virginia and/or the Supreme Court of the United St… |
| 22-7334 |
In Re Quincetta Y. Cargill |
|
2023-04-20 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-rights due-process habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance institutional-conditions intellectual-disability legal-appeal medical-treatment mental-health procedural-challenges rules-of-court standing |
Where petitioner has been denied showing a probability of success on the merits |
| 22-5118 |
Bejan David Etemad v. North Dakota |
North Dakota |
2022-07-18 |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-procedure due-process judicial-review rules-of-court standing state-courts |
Can North Dakota Supreme Court abrogate their own rules? |
| 21-7362 |
Kyle Kurtz v. David W. Gray, Warden |
Sixth Circuit |
2022-03-14 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-rights due-process ex-post-facto free-speech habeas-corpus prosecutorial-misconduct reasonable-doubt rules-of-court self-defense |
Are the rules promulgated by the United States Supreme Court being enforced? |
| 20-6901 |
Antonio Sierra v. Jack Daneri, et al. |
Pennsylvania |
2021-01-15 |
Denied |
IFP |
4th-amendment civil-rights criminal-procedure due-process fourth-amendment habeas-corpus rules-of-court standing state-court-error unreasonable-seizure |
Whether petitioner sufficiently asserted federal rights in the case being heard by state courts who defeated by rules of court, in error, petitioner's… |
| 19-8685 |
In Re Gigi Fairchild-Littlefield |
|
2020-06-12 |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
attorney-duties civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process habeas-corpus legal-procedure rules-of-court standing state-attorney-general writ-of-certiorari |
When a State Attorney General has been admitted to the Bar of this Court, and has sworn an oath to support the Constitution of the United States, does… |
| 19-5850 |
Yurie Yamano v. Hawaii State Judiciary, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2019-09-06 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
article-vi civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-interpretation constitutional-law court-rules due-process judicial-misconduct procedural-irregularity rules-of-court separation-of-powers standing stare-decisis |
Whether the Court should resolve the issues of treason and anarchism by state judges |
| 18-8444 |
Primo C. Novero v. Duke Energy Florida, LLC, et al. |
Eleventh Circuit |
2019-03-19 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
access-to-courts administrative-jurisdiction civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-claims document-delivery due-process equal-access equal-protection right-to-jury-trial right-to-petition rules-of-court standing trial-by-jury |
Does the district court erred and had conflict with the U.S. Supreme Court Rule 29.2, and U.S. Constitution Amendment 14 due process in defining 'time… |
| 18-8425 |
Henry Johnson Lucas, Jr. v. Virginia |
Virginia |
2019-03-14 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appeals brady-violation civil-procedure civil-procedure-appeal-timeliness-dismissal-rules- constitutional-violation due-process evidence-suppression new-trial-motion procedural-error prosecutorial-misconduct rules-of-court standing timeliness |
Did the Virginia Supreme Court rule erroneously in dismissing petitioner's appeal as being untimely under Rule 5:9(a) of the Supreme Court of Virginia… |