No. 23-7769

In Re Johnny Smith

Lower Court: N/A
Docketed: 2024-06-20
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Relisted (2)IFP
Tags: bar-ethics court-rules criminal-procedure due-process indictment judicial-discretion judicial-misconduct legal-procedure prosecutorial-misconduct rule-of-court rules-of-court
Latest Conference: 2025-02-21 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Question not identified

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED ; I) WHY DOES A DEIENDAUT/PETIBONER RECIEVE DRIAL. AFTER DENIAL THAT ARE MISTITIED BU PROCEDURAL. GROUNDS!" WHEN MIB CLEAR AND LVIDENT THAT. RELIEF 1S WARRANTED? ee 2) 17 THE JUDGE, PROSECUTOR AUD DEFENSE ATI MEY ARE ALL BAR CERTIFIED, How 16 17 THAT LVERY ONE IGNORED A RULE OF COURT. S¢¢ Fla.®.Ceim.P. 3.167 (a) AND (c). es Se LISTOF PARTIES [ ] All parties appear in the caption of the case on the cover page. ; yf All parties do not appear in the caption of the case on the cover page. A list of . _.», all

Docket Entries

2025-02-24
Rehearing DENIED.
2025-01-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/21/2025.
2024-10-31
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2024-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2024-06-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
2024-04-05
Petition for writ of habeas corpus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed.

Attorneys

Johnny Smith
Johnny Smith — Petitioner
Johnny Smith — Petitioner