No. 23-7769
Relisted (2)IFP
Tags: bar-ethics court-rules criminal-procedure due-process indictment judicial-discretion judicial-misconduct legal-procedure prosecutorial-misconduct rule-of-court rules-of-court
Latest Conference:
2025-02-21
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
1) WHY DOES A DEFENDANT/PETITIONER AFTER DENIAL OF APPEAL UNDER 3.850 AS FILED IN FEDERAL COURT ALL UNDER HABEAS CORPUS IS WARRANT?
2) PROSECUTOR DELAY/VIOLATION OF APPELLATE RULES IGNORED A RULE OF COURT - SUCH AS F.R.C.M. P. 3 IN WHICH AND BELIEVED DENIAL
3) AND VIOLATION OF TWO TIER
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Question not identified
Docket Entries
2025-02-24
Rehearing DENIED.
2025-01-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/21/2025.
2024-10-31
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2024-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2024-06-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
2024-04-05
Petition for writ of habeas corpus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed.
Attorneys
Johnny Smith
Johnny Smith — Petitioner