Kyle Kurtz v. David W. Gray, Warden
DueProcess HabeasCorpus CriminalProcedure JusticiabilityDoctri
Are the rules promulgated by the United States Supreme Court being enforced?
QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Are the rules promulgated by the United States Supreme Court not being enforced by the judges representing the Kingdom of Judah or are the law enforcement officers, the prosecution, blatantly violating the rules promulgated by the United States Supreme Court and promoting slavery with no way for the indigenous oppressed poor man to protect himself against such blatant corrupt practices of Jaw enforcement? Does a District Court Judge or a Sixth Circuit Court Judge possess the legislative power to implement their own rules when executing sworn judicial duties and would such legislative power exercised by a Judge be contrary to the rules promulgated by the Supreme Court of the United States for practice and procedure of all inferior Courts? Does Ohio Supreme Court Practice Rule 7.01(A)(4) governing delayed appeals implement any time limitation in executing a delayed appeal to the Ohio Supreme Court? , Does the Columbus Police Department possess the power and authority to enter me into a treaty, alliance and/or confederation that is foreign to the United States Constitution (Contract) and/or Ohio Constitution (Subcontract)? . Does the Franklin County, Ohio prosecutor's office have the authority to alter rules of criminal procedure in order to convict me? Does the Franklin County, Ohio prosecutor's office possess the authority to alter the rules of evidence in order to convict me? Does the Franklin County, Ohio prosecutor's office possess the authority to vouch for witness’ testimony as if the testimony were credible or is that prosecutorial misconduct? Does the Franklin County, Ohio prosecutor's office possess the authority to practice prohibited Ex Post Facto law? Does the Franklin County, Ohio prosecutor's office possess the power to coerce me into involuntary speech without acknowledgment of my Constitutional rights as an accused citizen? Does U.S.C.S, 2254 Rule 5(b) state in addition to addressing each allegation in a petition the respondent must state any procedural bar? Did the state of Ohio witness’ commit perjury on the stand under sworn oath? Did the Franklin County, Ohio prosecutor's office cover up perjured testimony and prospectively vouched for their witness’ perjury as more credible than all admitted Self-Defense evidence in order to convict me and win the trial? Did the Franklin County, Ohio prosecutor’s office commit prosecutorial misconduct? Would the state of Ohio witness’ perjured testimony and prosecutorial misconduct be obstructed justice because a sufficiency review has | not been conducted in any Courthouse? Did the Federal District Court and the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals allow a blatant violation of U.S.C.S. 2254 Rule 5 by respondent's representation, Assistant Attorney General Lamb, by not enforcing addressment of the allegations in the Habeas Corpus petition before stating any bars? ! | Does any law being enforced by the Executive branch of Ohio government, Assistant Attorney General William Lamb, remain in effect through lapse of following procedure of U.S.C.S. 2254 Rule 5 and its relation to U.S.C.S. Title 28 section 2072? : Did my Court-appointed attorney, George Leech, who is currently a Judge on the juvenile Court in Franklin County, Ohio assist me in | claiming the affirmative defense of Self-Defense to seven indicted counts by a Grand Jury of Franklin County, Ohio as a contractual obligation? | Was a contractual obligation, ordered by the Franklin County Common Pleas Court's appointment of George Leech, to provide a complete defense against seven indicted counts by the Franklin County, Ohio prosecutor's office? Was a contractual obligation a complete defense of an affirmative defense of Self-Defense between Court-appointed counsel George Leach and J during a criminal trial held February 6 through 10, 2017? Was a contractual obligation of a complete defense of an affirmative defense of Self-Defense impaired by prohibited practice of Hx Post Facto law by the Frank