Whether the petitioner was entitled to a jury instruction on his theory of defense and the requested jury instruction on voluntary manslaughter and imperfect self-defense

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED PAGE (9) | None & WSMPARIES HAVE A FUNDAMENTAL oe, RIGHT GUARANTEED @y THE FiPTH. Sixth | ANO FoRTEBNTH AMENDMENTS TOAPRAPER | INSTRUCTED JoRY OETERMINING THAT ALL ELEMENTS OF THE CHARGED CRIMES HAVE _ — BEEN PRovEN BEYonA A REASONABLE. QouwAl e : ° : o PB) ; e ° 2 Ay Be | WAS WSMPARIES ENTITLED To A dury . . INSTRUCTION PINFDINTING His THEORY _ OF OEFENSE AWO WAS HE ENTTHED TO_THE QEQUESTED JURY INSTRUCTION | — CALCRIM NO S57. VoLusTARY MANSLADTER, : | IMPERFECT GELP-QEFENSE. > « Hm45 WHERE AN HoNESL ASD REASONARSLE. | QELIEF in) THE NEED 10 OFFEND IS A ComPLETE QEFENSE. oFS AN HONES ALT UNREASONABLE ABLE RED NCE TRE oo HoMiGid& TO MANSLAUGATER LAW . » Gi i QUESTION (A) CONTINUED PAGE(S) (0. | a | ‘ Or THE TRIAL Court COMMIT REVERGALE s ERROR BY REFWSING HuPARIES REQDESTED «|| INSTRUCTION on IMPERFECT SELF-DEFENSE. . . M41 >|) Ey TAE PROSECUTION PRESENT. oo |) _SURSTANTIAL EVIDENCE To SuSTAIN nj} ASREMEDITATION AMO DELAERAIE 2 FIRST OEGREF MURDER ConncTION. . . MZ v7 |[F. DOES THE NIST CIRCIT CONRT OF — is |) APPEALS RAVE INRERENT ADTHARITY 1s|} TO OFEM Wid REQUEST FoR CERTIFICATE | || OF APPEALABILITY AS A REQUEST FoR, | ; 18 EX TENTION, OF TIME. @ a o eo 8 @:;