No. 20-1074

Sedfrey M. Linsangan v. Alice M. Taijeron, et al.

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2021-02-05
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Relisted (2)
Tags: civil-rights constitution constitutional-rights due-process election-law first-amendment free-speech guam-law legal-burden political-office standing
Key Terms:
JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2021-04-16 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Question not identified

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED mo, JL "Is there anything else that I need to suffer or injure in order to qualify for the standing issue? a Oe 2. How could I live the quality of life that I desire if I cannot pursue my happiness in serving the people because Guam laws substantially burdened me and _ other people to run for office? | 3. Did the court misinterpret the First Amendment of the Constitution the way it is written by creating a policy or requirement on grievances and Section2 of Article III Constitution? 4. Am I not exempted for the three (3) elements of standing since Guam we laws took away some of my constitutional rights and deprived me of my rights and privileges and therefore should not be a law? |

Docket Entries

2021-04-19
Petition DENIED.
2021-03-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/16/2021.
2021-01-25
Motion (20M47) for leave to proceed as a veteran Denied.
2021-01-06
MOTION (20M47) DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/22/2021.
2020-10-28
Motion (20M47) for leave to proceed as a veteran filed.
2020-10-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 8, 2021)

Attorneys

Sedfrey M. Linsangan
Sedfrey M. Linsangan — Petitioner