| 23-5306 |
Kenneth Ray Holbert, Sr. v. Texas |
Texas |
2023-08-09 |
Denied |
IFP |
abuse-of-discretion constitutional-right direct-appeal ineffective-assistance legal-burden state-court state-court-procedure strickland-standard strickland-test summary-reversal two-pronged |
Where a Strickland claim is appropriately raised on direct appeal, may a state court add to the two-pronged Strickland test a burden of showing the tr… |
| 22-7405 |
Earl C. Handfield, II v. Bobbi Jo Salamon, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Rockview, et al. |
Third Circuit |
2023-04-28 |
Denied |
IFP |
brady-v-maryland counsel-performance due-process federal-courts legal-burden prejudice prosecutorial-misconduct strickland-v-washington |
1. DOES BRADY V MARYLAND LAW WARRANT CLARIFICATION DUE TO FEDERAL COURTS ADDING A COUNSEL PERFORMANCE' PRONG TO THE BRADY ANALYSIS WHICH CONFUSES THE … |
| 20-1074 |
Sedfrey M. Linsangan v. Alice M. Taijeron, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2021-02-05 |
Denied |
Relisted (2) |
civil-rights constitution constitutional-rights due-process election-law first-amendment free-speech guam-law legal-burden political-office standing |
Is there anything else that I need to suffer or injure in order to qualify for the standing issue?
2. How could I live the quality of life that I des… |
| 20-6698 |
Richard H. Morrison v. Florida |
Florida |
2020-12-23 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appellate-review burden-of-proof constitutional-procedure criminal-procedure due-process evidentiary-burden habeas-corpus legal-burden procedural-standard state-courts state-jurisdiction |
DO THE STATE HAVE THE BURDEN, AND THEN THAT BURDEN SHIFT BACK TO THE DEFENDANT TO CHALLENGE? |
| 20-94 |
Martin Dekom v. Nationstar Mortgage, LLC |
New York |
2020-07-29 |
Denied |
|
civil-procedure court-intervention due-process foreclosure foreclosure-procedure judicial-rulemaking legal-burden rulemaking-power standing statutory-interpretation statutory-requirements |
A county court in New York invented a legal process which streamlines foreclosure by removing statutory requirements and motions. Can a court of its o… |
| 18-7219 |
Jose Amador and Diana Mekaeil v. United States |
Tenth Circuit |
2019-01-02 |
Denied |
IFP |
appellate-review burden-of-proof circuit-split criminal-procedure due-process exclusionary-rule invited-error judicial-procedure legal-burden standard-of-review warrantless-search |
Whether a finding of invited error requires a finding of deliberateness |