| 23-5521 |
Jackie Gaff v. MSNI Advantage, L.P., et al. |
Fifth Circuit |
2023-09-06 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process federal-rules-of-civil-procedure foreclosure foreclosure-procedure non-judicial-foreclosure standing standing-requirement ucc ucc-regulations |
Whether Petitioner's Constitutional Rights and Due Process were violated through Texas non-judicial foreclosure and abuse of FRCP 12(b)(6) motions |
| 20-1703 |
Martin Dekom v. Federal National Mortgage Association, et al. |
Second Circuit |
2021-06-08 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
civil-procedure civil-rights due-process equal-protection foreclosure-procedure judicial-authority judicial-usurpation mortgage-fraud rooker-feldman-doctrine second-amendment standing |
Can courts alleviate their backlog by letting staffers usurp the authority of judges? |
| 20-764 |
Mark E. O'Brien v. U.S. Bank Trust, N.A., as Trustee for LSF9 Master Participation Trust |
Connecticut |
2020-12-03 |
Denied |
|
due-process foreclosure foreclosure-procedure judicial-notice loan-servicer mortgage-note new-evidence procedural-defect standing standing-challenge testimony |
Were the Defendants' due-process rights violated? |
| 20-154 |
Wayne P. Byzon, et ux. v. PNC Bank, National Association, Successor by Merger to National City Bank |
Pennsylvania |
2020-08-13 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
act-6 act-6-of-1974 act-91 act-91-of-1983 foreclosure foreclosure-procedure homeowner-assistance homeowner-assistance-settlement-act mortgage-company mortgage-notices notices sheriff-sale |
Whether the mortgage company's Act 6 of 1974 and Act 91 of 1983 notices were adequate? |
| 20-94 |
Martin Dekom v. Nationstar Mortgage, LLC |
New York |
2020-07-29 |
Denied |
|
civil-procedure court-intervention due-process foreclosure foreclosure-procedure judicial-rulemaking legal-burden rulemaking-power standing statutory-interpretation statutory-requirements |
Can a court of its own interstitial rulemaking power supplant or replace the legislative scheme? |
| 19-81 |
Vivian L. Rader, et vir v. Citibank, N.A., et al. |
Tenth Circuit |
2019-07-16 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
due-process equal-protection foreclosure-procedure fourteenth-amendment non-judicial-foreclosure property-rights standing takings |
Is Colorado's system of non-judicial foreclosure unconstitutional under the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses? |