No. 20-154
Wayne P. Byzon, et ux. v. PNC Bank, National Association, Successor by Merger to National City Bank
Response Waived
Tags: act-6 act-6-of-1974 act-91 act-91-of-1983 foreclosure foreclosure-procedure homeowner-assistance homeowner-assistance-settlement-act mortgage-company mortgage-notices notices sheriff-sale
Key Terms:
JusticiabilityDoctri
JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2020-10-09
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the mortgage company's Act 6 of 1974 and Act 91 of 1983 notices were adequate?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED 1. WHETHER THE MORTGAGE COMPANY’S ACT 6 OF 1974 AND ACT 91 OF 1983 NOTICES WERE ADEQUATE? 2. WHETHER THE COURT ERRED IN NOT APPLYING THE HOMEOWNER ASSISTANCE SETTLEMENT ACT, DISMISS THE FORECLOSURE, SET ASIDE THE SHERIFF'S SALE, AND REQUIRE THE MORTGAGE COMPANY TO REFILE THE FORECLOSURE WITH NEW NOTICES? -ii
Docket Entries
2020-10-13
Petition DENIED. Justice Alito took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
2020-09-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/9/2020.
2020-09-11
Waiver of right of respondent PNC Bank, N.A.successor by merger to National City Bank to respond filed.
2020-08-07
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 14, 2020)
Attorneys
PNC Bank, N.A.successor by merger to National City Bank
Mark Anthony Carter — Dinsmore and Shohl, LLP, Respondent
Mark Anthony Carter — Dinsmore and Shohl, LLP, Respondent
Wayne P. and Priscilla L. Byzon
Michael Stephen Geisler — Michael S. Geisler, Attorney-at-Law, Petitioner
Michael Stephen Geisler — Michael S. Geisler, Attorney-at-Law, Petitioner