Does Brady v Maryland law warrant clarification due to federal courts adding a 'counsel-performance' prong to the Brady analysis which confuses the law with Strickland v Washington and increases the burden of showing prejudice?

No question identified. : 7 No. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES EARL HANDFIELDPetitioner i . VS. BOBBI J O SALAMONRespondent ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI -TO | Third Circuit Court of Appeals Earl Handfield SCI-Rockview; 1 Rockview Place Box A . Bellefonte, PA 16823 . —. (814)-355-4874 an . . ~ ; ' i QUESTION(S) 1 1. DOES BRADY V MARYLAND LAW WARRANT CLARIFICATION DUE TO FEDERAL COURTS ADDING A 'COUNSEL PERFORMANCE' PRONG TO THE BRADY ANALYSIS WHICH CONFUSES THE LAW WITH STRICKLAND V *” WASHINGTON AND INCREASES THE BURDEN OF SHOWING PREJUDICE? m ; w : a 7 ; . LISTOF PARTIES __ . [X ] All parties appear in the caption of the case on the cover page. ‘” [ ] All parties do not appear in the caption of the case on the cover page. A list of all