No. 20-1085
Scott Erik Stafne v. Thomas S. Zilly, Judge, United States District Court for the Western District of Washington, et al.
Response Waived
Tags: 42-usc-1983 article-iii civil-rights due-process good-behaviour-tenure judicial-independence judicial-tenure jurisdictional-challenge separation-of-powers standing
Latest Conference:
2021-04-16
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether the challenge that a jurist is not an Article III judge because she or he does not have "good behaviour" tenure is a jurisdictional one which must be considered by federal courts and judges.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the challenge that a jurist is not an Article III judge because she or he does not have 'good behaviour' tenure is a jurisdictional one which must be considered by federal courts and judges
Docket Entries
2021-04-19
Petition DENIED.
2021-03-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/16/2021.
2021-03-10
Waiver of right of respondent Thomas S. Zilly, Judge, United States District Court for the Western District of Washington, et al. to respond filed.
2021-02-01
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 10, 2021)
Attorneys
Robert "Ty" Trenary; Snohomish County Sheriff Adam Fortney
Scott Stafne Law Advocacy & Consulting
Scott Erik Stafne — Stafne Law Advocacy & Consulting, Petitioner
Thomas S. Zilly, Judge, United States District Court for the Western District of Washington, et al.
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent