Question not identified

QUESTIONS PRESENTED . 1. Whether subject matter jurisdiction matter was properly invoked involving a continuing violation of Title VII, 1983 etc in the underlying claims of retaliation and hostile environment conditions in the reinstatement process of a jury award and reinstatement. 2. Whether a timely well-pled complaint and court record pleading was sufficient to withstand dismissal by Rule 12 (b)(6) when a prior case won by Jury trial by the petitioner is a continuing violation of repeated acts and or the petitioner is accused of being handicapped disabled. 3. Whether the District Court and the Third Circuit deviated from acceptable judicial proceeding in this case that requires this courts supervisory power pursuant to Rule 10. 4. Whether procedural process denied the rights of the petitioner by misrepresentation and criminal acts during the appeals process and the misleading and violations of the rules of professional conduct involving attorneys hired by the petitioners 5. Whether the Respondents attorney took steps to overturn a jury award by misguided and criminal acts. Aiding and abetting the distribution of the Back Pay Award to avoid proper IRS Tax reporting and withholdings. Giving and allowing the petitioners attorney Leonard Sweeney to illegally endorse forgery of the check to cash out of State. Commingling the funds without the knowledge of the petitioner. TAX FRAUD \ 4 ii . Questions Continued 6. Whether Petitioners Attorney Christopher P. Skatell misrepresented the petitioner. The Petitioner does not understand the filing of case No. 2:18 -cv-01409 by his attorney when the attorney was fully briefed and knew of the appeal PRO SE and the extension was denied knowing , that he had to File for the Writ of Certiorari. To file the 1983 and Title Vii would be fruitless and the case would be ; dismissed by res judicata. Unbelievable especially after the promises of Christopher p. Skatell to prosecute Leonard Sweeney, to end my pension hearing quickly with the evidence supplied and to re-file my 1983. Title Vii claims appeal to SCOTUS, 7. Whether Petitioner was abused of his constitutional rights to protect the perpetrators by the attorney Christopher P. Skatell involving violations of Professional Conduct while draining the petitioners Bank Account while withholding factual evidence from the Honorable Courts and Pension hearing examiner. Falsely representing the petitioner for monetary and political gain. 8. Whether the petitioner was set up into Tax Fraud one way or the other. 9. Whether a Lower Court is or is not Restricted to Act Even when a case is marked as Closed on the Docket and Notices. Case 97-0786 Case3-15-cv-00058 and Case No. 2:18-cv-01409 \ 4 iti