No. 20-1314
Joshua Gregory Richardson v. United States
Response Waived
Tags: constitutional-rights effective-assistance-of-counsel evidence-suppression ineffective-assistance-of-counsel investigation legal-procedure paid-citation sixth-amendment traffic-stop unlawful-search
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity
SocialSecurity
Latest Conference:
2021-04-16
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Counsel's decision not to suppress evidence unlawfully seized from a traffic stop because a traffic citation was paid, then relying on that paid traffic citation not to investigate any further, violated the Sixth Amendment Right to effective assistance of counsel?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED 1. Whether Counsel's decision not to suppress evidence unlawfully seized from a traffic stop because a traffic citation was paid, then relying on that paid traffic citation not to investigate any further, violated the Sixth Amendment Right to effective assistance of counsel? OPINIONS BELOW The opinion of the United States Court Southern District of West Virginia is attached to this petition as "
Docket Entries
2021-04-19
Petition DENIED.
2021-03-31
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/16/2021.
2021-03-29
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-12-29
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 21, 2021)
Attorneys
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent