No. 20-134
Abilio Hernandez, et al. v. Jason Boles, et al.
Tags: appellate-review civil-rights constitutional-law due-process fourth-amendment jury-deference jury-instructions standard-of-review traffic-stop warrant-check
Key Terms:
FourthAmendment HabeasCorpus JusticiabilityDoctri
FourthAmendment HabeasCorpus JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2020-11-13
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Should a federal appellate court grant deference to a jury's conclusions of law about constitutional issues in a civil rights lawsuit?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED L. In a civil rights lawsuit, should a federal appellate court grant deference to a jury's conclusions of law about constitutional issues? I. While waiting for a drug-sniffing dog during a traffic stop, may the police extend the stop by subjecting the driver and passengers to repetitive, back-toback checks for outstanding warrants, and by interrogating the driver and the passengers about their activities and their backgrounds? Or does such delay violate the Fourth Amendment? i
Docket Entries
2020-11-16
Petition DENIED.
2020-11-06
Reply of petitioners Abilio Hernandez, et al. filed. (Distributed)
2020-10-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/13/2020.
2020-10-08
Brief of respondents Jason Boles, et al. in opposition filed.
2020-08-31
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including October 8, 2020.
2020-08-28
Motion to extend the time to file a response from September 8, 2020 to October 8, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
2020-08-03
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 8, 2020)
Attorneys
Abilio Hernandez, et al.
Paul Andrew Justice III — The Justice Law Office, Petitioner
Paul Andrew Justice III — The Justice Law Office, Petitioner
Jason Boles, et al.
Joseph F. Whalen III — Attorney general's Office, Respondent
Joseph F. Whalen III — Attorney general's Office, Respondent