No. 20-138

Joseph R. Biden, Jr., President of the United States, et al. v. Sierra Club, et al.

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2020-08-07
Status: Judgment Issued
Type: Paid
Amici (16)Relisted (2) Experienced Counsel
Tags: administrative-law appropriations appropriations-transfer department-of-defense executive-power judicial-review national-security separation-of-powers standing statutory-authority statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw Securities Immigration JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2020-10-16 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether respondents have a cognizable cause of action to obtain review of the Acting Secretary's compliance with Section 8005's proviso in transferring funds internally between DoD appropriations accounts

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED In Section 8005 of the Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2019, Pub. L. No. 115-245, Div. A, Tit. VIII, 132 Stat. 2999, Congress authorized the Secretary of Defense to transfer certain appropriated funds between Department of Defense (DoD) appropriations accounts “[u]pon determination by the Secretary * ** that such action is necessary in the national interest.” Section 8005 contains a proviso stating “[t]hat such authority to transfer may not be used unless for higher priority items, based on unforeseen military requirements, than those for which originally appropriated and in no case where the item for which funds are requested has been denied by the Congress.” bid. In 2019, the Acting Secretary of Defense transferred approximately $2.5 billion pursuant to Section 8005 and another similar provision to make funds available for DoD to respond to a request from the Department of Homeland Security for counterdrug assistance under 10 U.S.C. 284, including in the form of construction of fences along the southern border of the United States. The questions presented are as follows: 1. Whether respondents have a cognizable cause of action to obtain review of the Acting Secretary’s compliance with Section 8005’s proviso in transferring funds internally between DoD appropriations accounts. 2. Whether the Acting Secretary exceeded his statutory authority under Section 8005 in making the transfers at issue. (I)

Docket Entries

2021-08-03
JUDGMENT ISSUED.
2021-07-02
The motion to vacate the judgment is granted. The judgment is vacated, and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit with instructions to direct the District Court to vacate its judgments. The District Court should consider what further proceedings are necessary and appropriate in light of the changed circumstances in this case.
2021-06-22
Reply of petitioners Joseph R. Biden, Jr., President of the United States, et al. filed.
2021-06-18
Response to motion from respondents States of California and New Mexico filed.
2021-06-18
Response in opposition to motion to vacate and remand from respondent Sierra Club & Southern Border Communities Coalition filed.
2021-06-11
Motion to vacate and remand filed by petitioners.
2021-04-30
Letter from the Acting Solicitor General notifying the Court of the April 30, 2021, memorandum of the Deputy Secretary of Defense, filed. (Distributed)
2021-02-03
Motion to hold further briefing in abeyance and remove the case from the February 2021 argument calendar GRANTED.
2021-02-01
Motion to hold further briefing in abeyance and remove the case from the February 2021 argument calendar filed by petitioners. (Distributed)
2021-01-28
Record from the U.S.C.A. 9th Circuit electronic and located on Pacer.
2021-01-25
Record requested from the U.S.C.A. 9th Circuit.
2021-01-25
Motion for divided argument filed by respondents GRANTED.
2021-01-22
CIRCULATED
2021-01-19
Brief amicus curiae of The Cato Institute filed. (Distributed)
2021-01-19
Brief amicus curiae of United States House of Representatives filed. (Distributed)
2021-01-19
Brief amici curiae of Federal Courts Scholars filed. (Distributed)
2021-01-19
Brief amici curiae of 87 Religious Organizations filed. (Distributed)
2021-01-19
Brief amicus curiae of Tohono O'odham Nation filed. (Distributed)
2021-01-19
Brief amici curiae of Former Members of Congress filed. (Distributed)
2021-01-19
Brief amici curiae of Defenders of Wildlife et al., filed. (Distributed)
2021-01-19
Brief amicus curiae of Rio Grande Landowners Coalition filed. (Distributed)
2021-01-19
Motion for divided argument filed by respondents.
2021-01-18
Brief amicus curiae of Pacific Legal Foundation filed. (Distributed)
2021-01-18
Brief amicus curiae of The Rutherford Institute filed. (Distributed)
2021-01-14
CIRCULATED
2021-01-12
Brief of respondents States of California and New Mexico filed. (Distributed)
2021-01-12
Brief of respondents Sierra Club & Southern Border Communities Coalition filed. (Distributed)
2021-01-06
Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, et al.
2020-12-31
SET FOR ARGUMENT on Monday, February 22, 2021
2020-12-15
Brief amicus curiae of Rep. Andy Barr filed.
2020-12-15
Brief amicus curiae of The American Center for Law and Justice filed.
2020-12-15
Brief amicus curiae of Landmark Legal Foundation filed.
2020-12-08
Brief of petitioners Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, et al. filed.
2020-12-08
Joint appendix filed. (Statement of costs filed 5/12/21).
2020-11-24
Motion to extend the time to file the briefs on the merits granted. The time to file the joint appendix and petitioners' brief on the merits is extended to and including December 8, 2020. The time to file respondents' briefs on the merits is extended to and including January 12, 2021.
2020-11-13
Motion for an extension of time to file the briefs on the merits filed.
2020-10-19
Petition GRANTED.
2020-10-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/16/2020.
2020-09-24
Reply of petitioners Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, et al. filed. (Distributed)
2020-09-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/9/2020.
2020-09-17
Letter waiving the 14-day waiting period for the distribution of the petition for a writ of certiorari pursuant to Rule 15.5 filed.
2020-09-16
Brief of respondents California and New Mexico in opposition filed. (Distributed)
2020-09-16
Brief of respondents Sierra Club & Southern Border Communities Coalition in opposition filed. (Distributed)
2020-09-08
Brief amicus curiae of The American Center for Law and Justice filed.
2020-09-08
Brief amicus curiae of Rep. Andy Barr filed.
2020-09-08
Brief amicus curiae of Landmark Legal Foundation filed.
2020-09-02
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including September 16, 2020, for all respondents.
2020-09-02
Response to motion from petitioner Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, et al. filed.
2020-09-01
Motion of respondents California and New Mexico to extend the time to file a response from September 8, 2020 to September 16, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
2020-09-01
Letter of September 1, 2020 from the Acting Solicitor General filed.
2020-08-07
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 8, 2020)

Attorneys

87 Religious Organizations
Steven Alan ZalesinPatterson Belknap Webb and Tyler LLP, Amicus
Steven Alan ZalesinPatterson Belknap Webb and Tyler LLP, Amicus
California and New Mexico
Joshua A. KleinCalifornia Department of Justice - Office of the Solicitor General, Respondent
Joshua A. KleinCalifornia Department of Justice - Office of the Solicitor General, Respondent
Defenders of Wildlife et al
Jason Craig RylanderDefenders of Wildlife, Amicus
Jason Craig RylanderDefenders of Wildlife, Amicus
Federal Courts Scholars
Brianne Jenna GorodConstitutional Accountability Center, Amicus
Brianne Jenna GorodConstitutional Accountability Center, Amicus
Former Members of Congress
John Arak FreedmanArnold & Porter Kaye Scholer, LLP, Amicus
John Arak FreedmanArnold & Porter Kaye Scholer, LLP, Amicus
Joseph R. Biden, Jr., President of the United States, et al.
Brian H. FletcherActing Solicitor General, Petitioner
Brian H. FletcherActing Solicitor General, Petitioner
Landmark Legal Foundation
Richard Peter HutchisonLandmark Legal Foundation, Amicus
Richard Peter HutchisonLandmark Legal Foundation, Amicus
Pacific Legal Foundation
Jonathan Calvin WoodPacific Legal Foundation, Amicus
Jonathan Calvin WoodPacific Legal Foundation, Amicus
Rep. Andy Barr
Lawrence J. JosephLaw Office of Lawrence J. Joseph, Amicus
Lawrence J. JosephLaw Office of Lawrence J. Joseph, Amicus
Rio Grande Landowners Coalition
Douglas Wharton AlexanderAlexander Dubose et al., Amicus
Douglas Wharton AlexanderAlexander Dubose et al., Amicus
Sierra Club & Southern Border Communities Coalition
Dror LadinAmerican Civil Liberties Union Fundation, Respondent
Dror LadinAmerican Civil Liberties Union Fundation, Respondent
States of California and New Mexico
Aimee Athena FeinbergCalifornia Department of Justice, Respondent
Aimee Athena FeinbergCalifornia Department of Justice, Respondent
The American Center for Law and Justice
Jay Alan Sekulow — Amicus
Jay Alan Sekulow — Amicus
The Cato Institute
Ilya ShapiroCato Institute, Amicus
Ilya ShapiroCato Institute, Amicus
The Rutherford Institute
Dorothy Alicia HickokFaegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP, Amicus
Dorothy Alicia HickokFaegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP, Amicus
Tohono O'odham Nation
Samuel Franklin DaughetyDentons-US LLP, Amicus
Samuel Franklin DaughetyDentons-US LLP, Amicus
United States House of Representatives
Douglas Neal LetterOffice of General Counsel of the U.S. House of Representatives, Amicus
Douglas Neal LetterOffice of General Counsel of the U.S. House of Representatives, Amicus